Reclaim Fund Ltd
Reference number: 536551
Instant download
Authorised by the FCA
This firm is on the FCA register and authorised to carry out regulated activities.
Identity
Check their details
Compare these against whatever you were given. Scammers clone real firm names and reference numbers but use their own phone number and website, so a detail that does not match the register is the clearest warning sign there is.
-
Verified website
-
Verified phone number
-
Verified address
Emperor Court, 2 Emperor Way, Crewe, Cheshire, CW1 6BD, United Kingdom
Company details
From the company's Companies House record.
- Company number
- 07344884
- Company status
- Active
- Company type
- Private limited company
- Incorporated
- 13 August 2010 (16 years old)
- Registered office
- 27 Old Gloucester Street, London, WC1N 3AX, United Kingdom
- Nature of business
-
- Financial intermediation not elsewhere classified (SIC 64999)
- Fund management activities (SIC 66300)
Current directors and secretaries
| Name | Role | Born | Appointed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adrian Paul Smith | Director | Apr 1969 | 16 Nov 2010 |
| Jennifer Watson | Director | Jan 1964 | 3 Jan 2019 |
| Donal Patrick Quaid | Director | Feb 1977 | 30 Aug 2022 |
| Saleh Saeed | Director | Jan 1967 | 14 Dec 2022 |
| Judith Buttigieg | Director | Nov 1969 | 13 Feb 2023 |
| Lawrence Martin Weiss | Director | Apr 1955 | 11 Jul 2023 |
| Maxwell Colin Ledlie | Director | Mar 1966 | 24 Feb 2025 |
| Rubaba Khan | Director | Mar 1985 | 1 Sep 2025 |
| ELEMENTAL COMPANY SECRETARY LIMITED | Corporate secretary | Not published | 16 May 2024 |
Warning
Scammers have impersonated this firm
Fraudsters have used this firm's name or details with their own contact information to appear genuine. Check whatever you were given below, and against the firm's real details above.
Fake email addresses (2)
- reclaimfund@protonmail.com
- reclaimfund@reclaimfund.ltd
Fake websites (1)
- reclaimfund.ltd
The FCA warning these came from
- Reclaim Fund Ltd 18 September 2020
Scammers change these details often. Always check the live FCA warning.
Activities and protection
What the record covers, and how you are protected
Permissions on the FCA record
- Hold or safeguard your money
Limits on the record
-
Dormant account fund operator Requirement 1
Requirement 1. The firm is required to adhere to the rules in: (i) SYSC 4.1.1 R to 4.1.2 R and 7.1.16 R as if it were a BIPRU firm;(ii)GENPRU sections 1.2, 1.3 (subject to other requirements in this permission) and 2.1 as if it were a BIPRU firm;(iii) BIPRU section 3, apart from rules 3.1.2 to 3.1.4, 3.2.1 to 3.2.8, 3.2.20, 3.2.21, 3.2.24, 3.2.26 to 3.2.37, 3.3, 3.4.1 to 3.4.5, 3.4.7 to 3.4.15, 3.4.18, 3.4.20 to 3.4.23, 3.4.25, 3.4.27, 3.4.29, 3.4.31 to 3.4.94, 3.4.97 to 3.4.102, 3.4.106 to 3.4.109, 3.4.111 to 3.4.126, 3.4.132,3.4.133, 3.5.2, 3.5.6 to 3.5.8, section 6, apart from rule 6.2.1, and rules 7.1.3(2), 7.2.3(3), 7.4 and 7.5 of section 7 as if it were a BIPRU firm; and(iv) INSPRU section 7.1, apart from rules 7.1.1 to 7.1.3, 7.1.22 to 7.1.24, 7.1.28 and 7.1.74 to 7.1.90, as if it were an insurer. The firm is required to adhere to the guidance in SUP App 2.7.1G as if that guidance were a rule and as if the firm were an insurer. The firm is required to adhere to the following rules as if it were a BIPRU firm with modifications to those rules as noted here:(i) BIPRU rule 3.2.20, with the modifications that the reference in paragraph (1) to BIPRU 3.4 is replaced by BIPRU 3.5, and the words after exposure is assigned in paragraph (2) are deleted; and(ii) BIPRU rules 3.2.21 and 3.2.24, with the modification in both that the word standardised is replaced by the word simplified. The firm is required to adhere to the following guidance as if that guidance were a rule and as if the firm were a BIPRU firm:(i) BIPRU 3.5.3 G, with the modification that, in the first sentence, the word should is deleted and replaced by must, and the second sentence is deleted;(ii) BIPRU 3.5.4 G, with the modification that the word should is deleted and replaced by must; and(iii) the table in BIPRU 3.5.5 G, with the following modifications:(a) the provisions relating to the exposure classes of mortgages on residential or commercial property are deleted;(b) in relation to securitisation exposures, the words generally and may look through to underlying expo sures if BIPRU 9 allows in the provisions regarding risk weight and the words in the comments column are deleted; and (c) CIU exposures must be given a risk weight at 100% unless the CIU is deemed a high risk under BIPRU 3.4.118 R, in which case it shall be given a risk weight of 150%. Requirement 1 must be read in conjunction with Requirement 2.
-
Dormant account fund operator Requirement 2
Requirement 2. This is to be read in conjunction with Requirement 1. The firm must not incur exposures to mortgages on residential or commercial property.The firm must calculate its operational risk capital as a normalised income indicator equal to the three-year average of the total amount of monies held (calculated as monies held at the beginning of the year, plus monies received during the year and less monies paid out during the year) multiplied by:(i) 0.035, and then, (ii) 15%, representing the sum equivalent to the percentage specified for the basic indicator approach. Where the firm does not have sufficient data to meet the three-year requirement, it may use its forecasted fund projections for all or part of the three year time period when calculating its normalised income indicator.The firm is required to calculate its best estimate of the dormant account fund operator's liabilities on the basis that those must equal the present value of the probability-weighted average of future cash flows discounted in accordance with the relevant risk-free interest rate term structure.The firm must calculate its capital resources on the basis that those are the excess of its assets over its foreseeable liabilities. The firm must ensure that effective arrangements are in place with the bank or building society prior to consenting to any transfer of dormant account funds.Such arrangements must ensure that:i. effective repayment claims by those entitled to balances from dormant accounts can be made;ii. following the transfer of balances from dormant accounts, complaints can be made where appropriate to the Financial Ombudsman Service;iii. the bank or building society, which transferred the balance from a dormant account appropriately provides for the possibility of the dormant account fund operator going into default and/or the bank or building society who transferred the balance going into default, in relation to the liaising with the Financial Services Compensation Scheme. Requirement 2 must be read in conjunction with Requirement 1.
Complaints: You can refer a complaint about this firm to the Financial Ombudsman Service for free, whichever activity it relates to.
Track record
FCA actions and complaints
No FCA disciplinary action, and no complaints recorded with the Ombudsman.
The clone warnings above are scammers using this firm's name, not something the firm has done.
Download this page as a PDF report
£5 for a clean, timestamped copy you can keep, file or send on. It also helps keep the site free to use and free of ads.
Instant download
Common questions